Friday, November 25, 2005

Arrests been made

Pertaining the case of the other two who were assaulted at Zouk before James and myself.....

The police went to make the arrests pertaining that assault last night. I got the call from one of the guys immediately. One of them made the identification of the suspects, and the evidence was also carted off. (they got whacked on the head with pretty heavy objects)

I'm happy things are finally moving for them.

I hope it will for us soon....

We're hoping their story will be covered in the press. Apparently there is yet another beating at Zouk, involving two brothers. Also by bouncers I believe. The press is waiting for Zouk's response on the matter.

Lawyer has sent off a legal letter to them for the assault and the defamation. Let's see how it goes from here. I'm itching to see justice done... I really believe strongly that being assaulted by anyone under any circumstances is a horrible, terrible thing.

Peace to all.

///Z.a

22 Comments:

Anonymous Ripcord said...

Good to see things finally moving! Stay strong and don't give in to intimidation by trolls, prank calls or any letters. You are telling the truth and you have nothing to worry.

Some people have advised you to 'get on with your life' but don't listen to them because it is people like them that make no difference in life.

25 November, 2005 16:02  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

Good to hear about this. Hope that justice will be served swiftly in your case as well.

Ok....I'm timing it...how long before the Bouncer Brigade jumps in and starts flaming ; p

25 November, 2005 16:08  
Anonymous penang said...

Glad things are moving.

25 November, 2005 17:08  
Anonymous malaysian said...

I want to see what stories zouk have to cook up now in the press.

25 November, 2005 17:27  
Anonymous krang said...

Another story you cooked up??

We don't know how the fight started between them, who instigated it, how badly they were beaten. For all you know, one of the guys could have walked right up to the bouncer in a drunken stupor and socked him right in the face. That, in my books, warrants a beating, regardless of right or wrong.

Either way, true or not, you're detracting from your original story.

This is not about them. It's about you. and day by day, you
story seems less and less believable. All talk, and no action.

On seperate note, if i were there during the alleged beating, I'd probaly join in as well. Having a face like yours (as seen from the previous link) is just enough reason to warrant that. How's that for a cheap shot?

25 November, 2005 23:17  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey Krang, her face tat bad arr???
LOL

26 November, 2005 00:49  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

friend from texas. you are waaay too trusting... maybe near the point of being naive... not quite there, but close...

26 November, 2005 03:21  
Anonymous disgrunted law dude. said...

wow.. until i SEE justice done.. this is still a bunch of boo hockey to me man. Lawyer sending letters or not.. it's a lawyer's job to look after his/her client's best interest.. and it depends how far they wanna bend backwards or blur the provisions of the advocates ordinance.. conscience? if we had a conscience we wouldn't be lawyers.

LEt's just say, if i didn't get beaten up, i can still allege that i was beaten up.. and i might even succeed if i had the 'evidence' on my side.

Not siding with whoever, or a member of the bouncer brigade. heh. I am just making the playing field level. Cause really.. this whole week it seems, there have only been two postings.. plus i am surprised its only malay mail who seem interested to cover it.

This is just as bad as the video of the police woman and the naked woman doing squats.. and the prime minister is getting up and whooping ass.. cause its a blow to the government and police.. well.. ain't this the same? esp for the tourism industry.

Let's all sit tight and watch. We actually learn a thing or two.

26 November, 2005 09:23  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

26 November, 2005 18:41  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

[EDIT TO ABOVE POST:]

Anonymous (Nov 26 03:21),

I may be too trusting of Ju-Lee's blog posting and the information she provides...but so what? It costs me nothing, besides some time and effort at reading and responding.

The abusive trolls who come in here and doubt her by lacing it with profanities on the other hand, are costing themselves their humanity. Same goes for the terminally stupid who post pointless doubting comments trying to make themselves come across sounding so smart. But then again, empty shells of existence like that probably have not much humanity in them anyways.

If she's a bullshitter, big deal. In the long run, it will catch up with her. But if she's telling the truth, then at least I am but one voice among the others who collectively give her the encouragement to tell her story....at the very least counteracting the illiterate, judgmental cocksuckers coming in here jumping up and down demonstrating the wrong turn the process of evolution took in their development.

26 November, 2005 18:59  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

Also, in deleting my comment above, I've noticed somehing that had previously caused all you cocksuckers to get your knickers in a twist. When it says 'Comment Deleted: This post has been removed by the author' it basically means the blogger/poster who wrote that particular comment deleted it....not Ju-Lee.

So, to all those previously accusing Ju-Lee of deleting comments......

BOOM!

26 November, 2005 19:03  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ouch. friend from texas. notice my nick...it says "anonymous". instead of putting my name i used a nick which severely decreases the impact, credibility and RELEVANCE of my posts. and here you are getting all riled up about a petty little comment, calling everyone you had a beef with "cocksuckers" and insulting the humanity of others...

which just proves to me that you're not defending her story, but defending her RIGHT to tell her story. you don't actually believe her...

just like many others who support her blindly, plz do so only if you truly believe her, not because you think "its the right thing to do".

right now to peoples eyes, im the bad guy for flaming the supporters, but if i went the other way around and flamed the disbelievers, i'd be the good guy, whether i manage to put forth good points or not, sub-consciously you would judge me this way...then you would choose yourself which side you'd want to be on.

my point is, when you choose which side you wana be on, its not always because THE STORY swayed your decision but rather WHO YOU ARE....the rebel, the rule-abider, the smartass, the attention-seeker, the sympathizer, the list goes on. consequently you would defend or doubt her case according to your choice.

if only people would comment on what they truly see in ju-lee's story, own personal nature aside...there would be no conflict here...

you already know what i really think about her story...and im betting deep down, its the same thing you're thinking. :)

27 November, 2005 03:22  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

Anonymous (27 Nov 03:22),

As a matter of fact, I do believe her story. And I also support her right to share that story. I may not agree with some of her comments egging on the flamers, but that in no way diminishes what she has to say....she probably has enough on her plate as it is and doesn't need to be out here proving anything to a bunch of abusive armchair detectives.

As far as I'm concerned, you don't look like the bad guy at all for that comment above....you're just stating your opinion in a polite way. And neither did other skeptics who put forth good arguments on why they deem the story unfeasible...without being abusive towards Ju-Lee or others who support her.

But you raise an excellent point on who you are and which side of the story you buy. It says a great deal about some of the folks posting on here (myself included).

And being anonymous vs. having a registered username means nothing. It just means one couldn't be bothered signing up, or is not posting on other blogs that do not permit anonymous comments. But I'm sure you meant that in a rather tounge in cheek fashion anyways ; p

27 November, 2005 14:51  
Anonymous jedi nite said...

texas dude, i think you're stupid. hahaha

27 November, 2005 19:58  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

Jedi Nite, sounds like you have your lightsaber holstered wrongly.

28 November, 2005 03:04  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I'm itching to see justice done"

There would be no need for justice had you not been so itchified to venture into the bathroom to suck on some white dick.

29 November, 2005 10:30  
Anonymous balls said...

Ooi, bouncers out there! You coward or what, you are so big, one of you can handle him already what, why you go and call more big size fella whack him, you no balls ar!

29 November, 2005 11:46  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous, I think friend from texas believes she is innocent until proven guilty whereas some others is the other way round.

He wanted to prove that the deleted comments may not be by the author but the poster 'coz most people only look at the surface.

I also sometimes neglected what's going on behind the scene.

29 November, 2005 11:59  
Anonymous macho tacho said...

hey above, you have no idea what friend from texas and the other "anonymnous' is arguing about, so pipe down! ur comments make no sense at all!

oh, and friend from texas, u shoudm't have replied that anonymous post. make you sound desperate to proove u are right.
sigh...and i bet u are going to post a reply to my comment as well...

30 November, 2005 14:55  
Blogger Friend from Texas said...

macho tacho, why don't you go fuck yourself?

30 November, 2005 21:44  
Anonymous eyeinthesky said...

friend from texas,

short but effective sentence. lol....

01 December, 2005 11:00  
Anonymous macho tacho said...

see wat i mean? he just cannot resist...

02 December, 2005 06:15  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home